.jpg)
The Orignial:
The passage below contains 7 mistakes. UNDERLINE the mistakes and WRTTE THEIR CORRECT FORMS in the space provided in the column on the right. (0) has been done as an example. (Trích: ĐỀ THI HỌC SINH GIỎI QUỐC GIA 2013)
There is a long-standing debate among users of “new media” and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) about so-called “net neutrality” the idea that no-one should control the Internet). Both sides claim to uphold what they call "Internet freedom", but it appears they have diverging views of exactly which is meant by freedom but it appears they have diverging views of exactly which is meant by freedom in this context.
For supporters of neutral, Internet freedom means equal, affordable access for whatever online applications and content they choose. In contrast, the ISPs say a free Internet means that the industry should be unimpeded by government oversight and that high- speed connections should be available for anyone who can afford it.
The debate is over grown with so many technical jargon that it hasn't attracted widespreading attention, but what's at stake are nothing less than the future of the Internet. The issue, essentially, is whether financial corporations become gatekeepers of online content and traffic, or whether small independent organisations can access the new technology without restrictions. Whichever way it goes, the outcome is likely to change the whole of popular culture.
Errors & Corrections:
There is a long-standing debate among users of “new media” and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) about so-called “net neutrality” the idea that no-one should control the Internet). Both sides claim to uphold what they call "Internet freedom", but it appears they have diverging views of exactly which is meant by freedom but it appears they have diverging -> divergent (1) views of exactly which is meant by freedom in this context.
For supporters of neutral -> neutrality (2), Internet freedom means equal, affordable access for -> to (3) whatever online applications and content they choose. In contrast, the ISPs say a free Internet means that the industry should be unimpeded by government oversight and that high- speed connections should be available for anyone who can afford it -> them (4).
The debate is over grown with so many -> much (5) technical jargon that it hasn't attracted widespreading -> widespread (6) attention, but what's at stake are -> is (7) nothing less than the future of the Internet. The issue, essentially, is whether financial corporations become gatekeepers of online content and traffic, or whether small independent organisations can access the new technology without restrictions. Whichever way it goes, the outcome is likely to change the whole of popular culture.
Explanations:
(1) It needs an adjective, not a gerund: divergent paths ~ divergent views ~ divergent opinions.
(2) "Of" is usually followed by a gerund or a noun. Neutral is an an adjective of neutrality.
(3) Access (to something): the opportunity or right to use something or to see somebody/something.
Ex: You need a security code to get access to the computer system.
(4) Them refers to high-speed connections.
(5) much + an uncountable noun (technical jargon)
(6) "Attention" needs an accountable adjective to modifies/describes it.
Structure: A/an + adjective + noun.
(7) Subject: what's at stake + singular verb
Tommy Bảo - Yêu Tiếng Anh
No comments:
Post a Comment